Reviews for CMSC451

Sort By:

Professor Filter:

Information	Review
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 03/15/2024	There was no syllabus. Midterm topics were decided the day before the exam. The location was also announced the day before the exam. Homework was taken from Laxman's class (Laxman's lecture recordings were a lifesaver). Final exam was copied from Laxman's final, with parts removed because lectures couldn't keep up with his section. I got the impression that there is a feedback loop of lack of engagement between students and teacher.
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Expecting an A+ Anonymous 01/29/2024	I agree with most of what has already been said about Laxman for CMSC451 over the fall 2023 semester, but I wanted to add another 5-star review because he deserves it.
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 01/11/2024	This professor is fantastic, and I would take any class taught by him. The homework (both written and programming) is challenging and time-consuming, but the course overall is manageable. Exams are medium-hard difficulty but fair. Both Laxman and the teaching assistants are super helpful and quick to respond. The lectures get complex sometimes, but that's expected with this class. You'll need to dedicate time outside of class to review lectures and read the textbook for a clearer understanding. Laxman genuinely cares about your learning, telling us to focus on learning while he takes care of our grades, and he really means it. His extensive industry experience really helps with understanding the applicability of the coursework. In my opinion, he's the best professor in the Computer Science department!
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 01/06/2024	Probably the best professor I have had here at UMD. Very understanding and caring professor. Makes the homeworks hard intentionally but gives you more than enough time and resources to do well on them. Definitely recommend taking the class with him
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Expecting an A- Anonymous 12/25/2023	Long homeworks, but very willing to help and super nice to talk to. Lectures are usually pretty good, but the content isn't always the most interesting.
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Expecting an A+ Anonymous 12/24/2023	The grading scheme for this semester was very very generous. The midterm and final are only worth 30% of our grade, while 70% is on homework. However, the drawback was that the homework was extremely time-consuming. There were 2 parts for each homework, writing (70-80%) and coding (20-30%). I really enjoyed the coding assignments, the difficulty varied from easy to medium to hard, just like leetcode. Ngl the homework took me at least 40 hours for each. But the TAs are super helpful, we could always ask them to verify our solutions or explain the concepts. Feel free to go to OH if you are struggling in the course. Laxman is very nice and responsive on piazza. He's a great lecturer as well. He also cares very much about his students, given that we got like 4-5 extensions on the homework. The course wasn't easy but you'll definitely learn alot. Take it with him if possible. The cutoffs were reasonable, as long as you spend time on the coursework, there's no way to fail the class.
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 12/23/2023	If I could rate him more than 5 starts, I would. Prof Dhulipala is very understanding. He wants to make sure everyone will take CMSC451 and pass it. Office hours are your best friend, he will try his best to answer your questions. Homeworks are quite difficult (as expected) but exams are very fair!! I would say the lectures vary in terms of speed. Sometimes he goes through material fast since there is a lot to cover and imo it was just better to listen and not take notes. (He also record lectures and uploads them!). All in all, awesome professor for CMSC451
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 12/22/2023	Laxman has been my favorite professor so far in my career at UMD. He has a strong passion for the course material and is always looking for ways to make the course more effective in passing that passion on to students. In many ways, 451 just picks up where 351 finished, so you spend time diving deep into a lot of different algorithmic ideas and patterns in a way that really helps you to strengthen your algorithmic thinking. It's also still just a survey course of algorithms, and after finishing this course I feel like a whole world has opened up to me. This semester we had competitive programming-style homework problems on CodeForces as well as written theory homeworks. You could pick any language you liked to implement your solutions. I really liked this way of teaching the course since it kept a strong focus on algorithm theory (very fun) but also forces you to really understand how to implement algorithms in practice. Definitely take Laxman, he cares.
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Expecting an A+ Anonymous 12/12/2023	Laxman is a great professor. He is very knowledgeable about algorithms (particularly graph algorithms and parallel algorithms). He is responsive to student feedback, and most importantly, he picks interesting topics to cover in the class. There is one homework every two weeks with a written and coding part. In my opinion, the coding parts were more challenging than the written part in most cases. He ended up giving a lot of extensions this semester, but hopefully in the future he will do a better job making the assignments doable in two weeks and sticking to that deadline. The ones towards the middle of the course are the hardest, but just try all of the problems, go to office hours and don't worry about your grade. The grading scheme is super favorable, so just focus on learning. The mitderm was easy as well.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting an A juiceman 08/26/2023	1. Did you think the exams or other major assignments were fair? · HW is fair but time-consuming, 10-15 hours each. The dynamic programming (HW3) was the hardest, 20 hours. · The midterm exam was challenging due to time constraints, but the final exam was very fair. · The bulk of assignments and exams require writing an algorithm, proving its correctness, and stating its run time. — 2. Did you think the professor had reasonable expectations of the students in the course overall? · Reasonable workload, with five homework assignments (one dropped) · Reasonable exam difficulty of one midterm and one final exam. He provided practical and clear exam preparation advice and plenty of practice. · I strongly recommend not to leave the homework until the last two days. Start a week early and go to OH! — 3. Were you a fan of the professor's teaching style? · Most organized professor I've had at UMD. · Assignments punctually released and graded. · Homework and lectures are very closely aligned with weekly suggested textbook readings. I highly recommend doing the readings before class if you're struggling. · His ability to present the content clearly and logically with drawings and clarifications impressed me. · I admired Childs’ willingness to answer questions during lecture even if it meant going slower. He frequently paused and encouraged asking for clarifications and questions. · He recognizes the difficulty of the course and pointed out historically confusing parts. · His handwritten iPad notes are well structured, a great resource, and updated promptly after lecture. I suggest writing your own notes by hand because of the open-note exams. · Recorded lectures. However, I recommend attending class because of the opportunity to ask questions, stay up to date, and there was unrecorded Q&A at the start. · When I asked questions during office hours, he demonstrated a thoughtful listening approach and genuine interest in helping me understand the course material better. Childs offered valuable feedback and diligently addressed questions. I valued the inclusive environment he fostered by allowing everyone to participate in the room/zoom, rather than seeing people one by one. · To establish a personal relationship with Prof Childs, it is necessary to take the initiative and bring forth topics for discussion. — 4. Was the workload appropriate for the number of credits? · Pretty heavy/demanding if you want an A. · Homework required considerable time and effort, 10-15 hours on each due biweekly. · The readings took around 2 hours per week. · Exam prep required approximately 20 hours each exam. — 5. Was this course a waste of time or was it beneficial in some way? · Challenging but highly rewarding course. · Deepen my understanding of computer science, algorithmic frameworks, and especially honed my critical and logical thinking. · Useful practice on presenting your ideas and algorithm. Topics like graphs, BFS, DFS, paths, cycles, topological sort, connected components, greedy (internal) scheduling, 1D 2D dynamic programming, etc are relevant for more advanced FAANG, leetcode interviews. · Reductions (network flow, NP completeness) helped me practice transforming a new problem into an instance of known problems. · A toolkit for writing algorithms! — 6. How much support were you given throughout the semester (office hours, extra resources, etc.)? · Representative practice problems for exams, but no solutions. You have to get feedback on your attempt through office hours or Piazza. · Childs displayed high responsiveness on Piazza, checking multiple times a day, including weekends, and personally responding to most questions. · Childs and TAs had 2 office hours per week each. · I highly, highly recommend Aditya Acharya's office hours! · Attending office hours and seeking early feedback significantly contributed to my success. — TLDR: Highly organized professor, reasonable exam expectations, challenging time-consuming homework, great teaching assistants, follows the textbook closely, records lectures and posts notes, useful for interviews, rewarding course, tangible improvements in algorithmic thinking, but heavy workload for an A. Highly recommend 451 with Childs!
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting an A- Anonymous 06/08/2023	I think he's a bit overrated in my opinion. He's very hard to talk to but he is receptive to questions, especially during lectures. However, he doesn't provide much insight regarding anything else. His responses are very brief and terse. The TAs were helpful at the very least. The tip to doing well in Childs's class is honestly to just LC. Many of the questions that appear are LC related especially divide and conquer, dynamic programming, and general graph algorithms (BFS/DFS/topological sort). You also don't need to attend class because he basically just summarizes the textbook which he didn't do amazingly. This is a decent class to take but there are more useful classes as you can just LC and learn the patterns yourself).
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting a B+ Anonymous 05/28/2023	Great course and great professor. You learn a lot and the course content is really valuable knowledge. Childs is really smart, answers all questions, and does his best to help everyone succeed. The homeworks are very difficult so I would say start them very early. The midterm and final are really really really difficult and hard to finish on time with averages in the 60s. Don't panic though because the course has a huge curve at the end of the semester. Biggest piece of advice is to start the homeworks very early and go to TAs with any questions. The hws are graded harshly for correctness and take up a huge portion of your grade, so do them well. Overall its a hard class but if you think you can handle it its very worth taking, especially with a professor childs because you can tell he really knows his stuff.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 05/22/2023	Very organized. Set up Piazza and office hours times weeks before the semester began. He knows the textbook forwards and backwards. He follows the assigned textbook readings very closely. So if you're struggling to keep up during lecture, do the assigned readings beforehand. The homework are long. HW3 (dynamic programming) was especially difficult. Make sure to start early (you're given 2 weeks to complete). The consist of 5 questions, typically all questions (except the NP HW) ask you to write an algorithm, prove its correctness, and state its running time. Use the textbook to complete homework early. Do not start any later than a week before the deadline. Each assignment took 10-20 hours to complete. Make sure to go to office hours to verify your thought process or you may get half credit on questions you incorrectly approach. The homework is however very fair and directly relevant to what we covered in class. HW average between 80-90%. I think what made me respect Prof Childs the most was that he was willing to answer questions during lectures fully. Even if this meant we did not get through supplementary topics at the end of the semester (had to cut out quantum lecture but posted for viewing on ELMS), he made sure to take any question serious and answer it without making anyone feel stupid. That's a classroom culture I appreciate. Sometimes however he does rush at the end to finish a proof if we got derailed with too many questions, but usually he saves it for the next class. During office hours, he was helpful. He gave hints on how to approach the homework. It was honestly helpful to explain my thought process and get that feedback from him. He allows multiple students in Zoom room at once or in person, so you get to listen to other students questions and perspectives as well, which is enriching. In regards to what 2 reviews down said about rapport, I will say that my interactions during office hours were mostly focused on course material and homework or practice problems. I think it is possible to build rapport, but you'll have to come with questions and willingness to share your interests. Most importantly, I felt like he did care about me and my understanding of the material. Sometimes he cracks jokes. Regarding exams, he made an especially difficult/ time crunch midterm (60% average), but he adjusted for it with a more lenient final exam (75% average). Overall cutoffs for the course: A-: 84, B-: 71, C-: 58. The biggest advice for exams I can give is to understand the homework well (what are the key concepts, thought processes), but then make sure to do as many practice problems as possible. Get your thought process verified by Childs or a TA. Big shout out to Aditya Acharya. He is the best TA for the course, go to his office hours if you can!! He makes his office hours basically into a discussion section for the course, white boarding concepts and helping get started on homework. Advice: Start HW early (1+ week) so that you can spend 10-20 hours. Stay up to date with the lecture. Attend in person if you can even though its recorded. Take advantage of Piazza since Childs responds very actively. Take advantage of office hours, especially TA OH for homework. Prepare early for the exams. Good luck! Take him if you have the privilege and get a seat. I feel like I learned a lot and it greatly helped me with my logical/algorithmic thinking.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting a B Anonymous 05/20/2023	Childs is one of the smartest Professors I've ever met and for a course like 451, him being able to answer as many questions as he did in class or piazza on the spot was very impressive. He really knows the algorithms and would be able to point out flaws in some of the suggested "what if ... " questions and I am super glad I took this class with him. I came into this class with not any more hope than to learn about some better ways to solve algorithm problems but am now considering getting a masters because I was very passionate about this class. If you want to be great in this class, I suggest doing the textbook readings before class, because the information definitely can be a lot and gets covered quickly sometimes. This way you can come to class with the knowledge and Childs can break it down further for you.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting an A- Anonymous 05/16/2023	I have some issues with this class that I'll discuss later but overall I think it's worth taking. It builds a lot of really useful skills and really helps you practice thinking critically. Pros: The class is organized very well. There's 5 homework assignments, each worth 10% of your grade with one dropped (so 40% total). They can take a long time to do and be pretty difficult, but you're allowed to work together on them. The TAs and prof are helpful during OH and responsive on Piazza. The hws help you to practice and build your understanding of the course content. The questions on the homework are about 1 or 2 levels more difficult than what'd you see on an exam, so they're good prep for that as well. There's one midterm and one final, which is nice because the exam load is less. The midterm is 20% of your grade and the final is 40%, which imo is too much but ig that's the tradeoff for only having 1 midterm. The midterm was pretty difficult (avg 60%) but the professor says he intends to curve at the end of the semester based on where grades fall with the final. The content is useful. I think I learned a lot about how to actually build and design new algorithms using existing algorithms or ideas (versus where in 351 you focus just on analyzing existing algorithms, not actually building anything new). That's the main difference between the 2 classes. He structures the class by first showing you 3-4 examples of algorithms using a specific technique (i.e. greedy) and then having you apply those algorithm's ideas to hw or exam questions. I think generally this class helped me to think critically about complex problems you'll encounter regularly in CS. Cons: I felt the lectures were rushed and sometimes unclear. The professor would often handwave proofs especially towards the end of the semester to save time which resulted in them being difficult to read and understand. The book does have each proof in it written in depth, and is generally very good. I'm not usually a big fan of learning from textbooks and would rather get content from lectures, videos, or online, but I found this one very well written and helpful. I'd consider reading the textbook required to be successful in this class, even though the professor considers it "recommended". This was a con for me but may be a pro for you. I personally kinda suck at proofs, and this class is entirely writing proofs (mainly proving your algorithm is correct). I think it was good experience to get but it was pretty difficult for me, especially at first. If you like proofs you'll do fine, but be prepared to be writing or studying proofs basically every day. A final being 40% of your grade imo is too much. I'd much prefer to have 2 midterms in this class and a lower weighted final. This is more so personal preference though.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting a C+ Anonymous 05/04/2023	He's a good teacher who's very organized. This class is tough. There are 5 HW assignments and he drops your lowest. Final is worth 40% so that's stressful. Class is curved. He is not the harshest grader. Stressful since you won't know your grade until its published.
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Expecting a B+ Anonymous 04/07/2023	The homeworks are definitely long, but Laxman was extremely responsive on piazza and always answered questions clearly in class. Was caring and compassionate during office hours which you should definitely take advantage of.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 03/11/2023	I came into this class with high expectations due to his ratings and reviews, but honestly think he is a bit overhyped. He speaks so fast during lectures that I physically wasn't able to keep up with notes, and had to stop coming to class and watch the videos instead so I could actually understand what was happening. Additionally, this may be subjective to each individual, but for me personally I felt that his lectures lacked structure which made it especially difficult for me to take organized and digestible notes. These are minor issues though-- my biggest disappointment was that he is not the kind of teacher that recognizes and reciprocates effort. I had hoped to TA this class in the future, and made a substantial effort to build a rapport with him, but he is simply just not the kind of professor that you can build a rapport with. He is not approachable in a way that makes you feel comfortable asking him questions, and I've seen/experienced several instances of him responding a bit curt/rudely to questions on Piazza. Overall, I feel that the way he communicates with students is not conducive to learning. TLDR: Very smart professor that really knows his stuff, but his expertise in algorithms does not exactly translate to an expertise in teaching.
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Anonymous 03/09/2023	Homeworks take extremely long, no consideration for students, doesnt respond to emails, condescending, take someone else if at all possible. biggest regret of my life.
Aravind Srinivasan CMSC451 Anonymous 01/05/2023	Very nice guy, always believes in his students. The class is more organized than 351, so it's easier in that way. It's also harder than 351 in that the homeworks are unbelievably difficult and time consuming, and the exams do not have anything to do with the homeworks (or even the practice exams). The 40% final exam is also scary. At least there is a massive curve. Definitely one of the harder CS classes, plan accordingly.
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Expecting a C+ Anonymous 12/19/2022	Had the other section, but I watched his lecture videos instead. Beast. Never left me hanging on Piazza. As far as the class goes, the homeworks made me want to cry. The dynamic programming homework was so hard for me that I started to resent the course.
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Expecting a C Anonymous 12/06/2022	New professor from industry, but has an excellent handle on a few areas that other professors struggle with. First of which is relating abstract material to real life. He manages to do this most often by incorporating the history and intuitions from which algorithms were developed into the introduction to learning them. Second of which, he takes time to engage with the class ALL THE TIME, and will not often leave a question unanswered. If he does, he usually clears it up after class. Exceedingly responsive on Piazza and ridiculously welcoming in office hours. Prof Dhulipala is a wonderful and passionate teacher, and I urge you not to take the kindness for granted nor take advantage of it, but instead take this opportunity to learn! The course material is rough, no doubt, but it is not for lack of teaching skill. The homeworks take a LONG time. I waited until far later in the semester than I should have to get assistance with them, so I will say this: do not push this class to the backburner to focus on other easier assignments first. I would say the best strategy would be to take some time to at least write questions you have about the homeworks at face value, early on, so you have something concrete to bring to office hours, and then go early to get guidance and intuition. Getting even a little bit of help goes miles.
Laxman Dhulipala CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 11/17/2022	Lectures are written on iPad. He keeps lectures interesting by relating algorithms to the history and intent of them in the past. His explanations focus on building intuition for algorithms and he answers questions thoroughly. The class is good for building general algorithms intuition which may help in other coursework. The class is a decent amount of work, the homeworks each take 6-8 hours and are quite difficult. The exams are reasonable. He is open to suggestions since he is new at teaching but he is doing a good job already.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting a B Anonymous 05/23/2022	Definitely one of the best professors in the department. Explains everything well, and the class definitely felt more manageable than 351, although that's not saying much. Homework is long though, so definitely start early on those. If you're not algorithmically challenged like I am, this class might be fairly easy for you.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting a B Anonymous 05/19/2022	pretty tough class but Childs is a very smart professor who explains content very well. homeworks take a long time (there are only 5 though so it's not terrible). wouldn't recommend taking this course with a heavy schedule but otherwise definitely recommend
Jonathan Katz CMSC451 Expecting a B+ Anonymous 12/24/2021	Overall a decent class. I'd actually give 3.5 stars out of 5 but I'd figure I round up if I have to decide between a 3 and a 4. Pros: - Great lectures - Comprehensive slides - Responsive on Piazza. Some people were saying that he's too blunt or rude, but I didn't really feel that way. I appreciate that his responses were to the point. - Helpful during office hours - Exams and homeworks were mostly fair - Useful content for technical interviews and fundamental CS understanding Cons: - Grading took way too long, particularly for the homeworks. However, the final was graded the same day, which is great on them. - Cutoffs could be more clear - Lecturing could be a bit slower so that people who are writing notes can copy points from the slides. This is likely because Katz covers more material than other professors. Katz may not be as good as Childs for this class, but he is miles better than Kruskal. My main suggestions for him are to try and enforce faster grading and to cover less material to let students have more time to grasp it. Other than that, you should be fine having him as your professor.
Jonathan Katz CMSC451 Expecting an A- Anonymous 12/23/2021	Katz is one of the best Professors at UMD. He is as good as one can get. It’s not only about understanding the concepts, but also thinking fast + critically. This is a skill to be built. After this class, I realized this, and it is probably the best realization in terms of academics I ever had, and something I neglected for so long - I need to learn to think critically + problem solve! Thanks to Katz I know now. Also, when he says anyone can get an A, he is 100% correct, it is all about experience and your ability to think critically (again, a skill that needs to be built from pushing yourself/practicing!).
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting an A- Anonymous 12/23/2021	I took this class Fall 2020 (online semester), but I thought Childs was a great professor. He's probably one of the most organized professors in the CS department. His course is heavily dependent on the textbook (which is amazing), but he does a really good job of breaking things down in a digestible way. I would like to say that I'm algorithmically-challenged, but I was still able to follow all of the lectures. He is extremely responsive on Piazza, and very lenient with partial credit. The class is not easy, and you'll definitely need to work for your grade, but overall this is a great class and I would 100% recommend taking it.
Jonathan Katz CMSC451 Anonymous 12/17/2021	The course materials are good and the assignments are very fair. However, I never knew what my grade was in the class since the homework assignments took forever to grade. Idk if it's the fault of the TAs or Katz, but it's an anxiety-inducing issue that Katz cares very little about.
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Expecting a B+ Anonymous 11/10/2021	Had him for 351/451. Got a B+ in both classes. Clyde is extremely lazy. When asked to go over some homework problems he may flat out refuse because it's too much work. Best thing you can do is form study groups and learn from other students. Pretty cool guy overall.
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Expecting an A tybug 05/30/2021	This is my second review of kruskal, the first being for CMSC 351, posted on 12/20/2020 (search for "tybug"). I've changed view slightly; I think he's actually quite a good lecturer, but the class is far too disorganized to get anything above 3 stars, similar to 351. I also didn't learn the things I was most excited for in this class: proving algorithm correctness (formally, not hand waving with a certifier) and learning how to come up with algorithms, not just analyzing existing ones.
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Expecting a B- Anonymous 05/30/2021	I took this class in Spring 2021. Typically, while most people say that your 451 grade with Kruskal is the same as your 351 grade with Kruskal, I feel as though your 451 grade may be lower. If you choose to take this class with Kruskal, be sure you know what you're doing... Pros: + The ridiculously long pre lecture videos from 351 are gone. The professor actually teaches new content during lecture time, making lectures highly informative. + He repeats most NP assignments from 351, so you can reuse your work + Professor is very chill regarding deadlines. Often, he would extend a homework deadline by a few dates simply because someone asked nicely. Our midterm deadline was actually moved by 2 weeks. Cons: - The quizzes from 351 that helped gauge your progress are (mostly) gone. We had a few at the beginning of the semester but they stopped afterwards - There are no written solutions given for any homework assignment (not just NP). This is especially detrimental when exams are often based off of homework assignments. While there are review sessions that go over homework assignments, they lack the formal rigor that a written solution would have. Also, there is no guarantee that the every problem is covered in these sessions. It is especially baffling that we do not have solution keys when this was done so often back in 351. - The live lectures are often very free-flowing and not directed without the slide set. This can make it difficult to determine what to take notes on. - No review material is given for either the midterm or final. The homework assignments do not make up for this. As a result, it is very easy to lose lots of points of exam questions where you may actually understand the concepts at hand. Again, exam review material is something that was easily made for 351, so I am shocked that they couldn't apply the same processes here to make it.
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Expecting an A csmathstudent 05/27/2021	Had Dr. Kruskal for CMSC351/451. He is not perfect, but I absolutely disagree with his 2.87 star rating. He has a good sense of humor and teaches algorithms in a way that makes it very intuitive. He also really makes sure to answer student questions during lectures and is helpful during office hours. One of the biggest complaints is that there is a really long turnaround time before things get graded. This is not any of the TA's or Kruskal's fault. They are simply understaffed for the amount of kids they have to manage. Another complaint is that the tests are completely unfair. This was absolutely not true in 351, where the problems were literally just slightly altered homework problems and problems that reflected lecture material. The tests for 451 I felt were more difficult. Many people also leave the class frustrated because they can't seem to get a good grade by rote memorization of the materials. I think that the problems Kruskal gives out on the homeworks and exams are fair for a difficult algorithms class and focused on difficult problem solving. It is, however, very difficult for any teacher to 'teach' a class math maturity or problem solving ability. You are simply going to have to do extra practice practice from the textbook if you haven't done these kids of problems before.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting a B Anonymous 01/04/2021	Childs was really fair, and I felt like a learned a lot through the course. It was challenging, but I could tell that all of the material was important. Grading was fast, and lectures were recorded. Piazza questions were answered quickly.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 12/26/2020	(Disclaimer: had him during fall 2020 virtual semester) I found the course a lot easier than 351. The homeworks were a bit challenging but I found that the TAs, at least during this semester, graded very generously (the rubrics are not like 351 where it’s basically 0%, 50%, or 100% per question). The tests were kind of hard to do under a time crunch but they were generally easier than the homeworks and again had generous rubrics. Childs is a nice professor and responsive to the students - he extended the deadline on one of our homeworks. If you’re interested in 451 I recommend taking it with him.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting an A- Anonymous 12/24/2020	Definitely the best professor for CMSC451. The lecture videos are concise, well put together, and very informative. The course was also structured in a way that allowed for a lot of flexibility for students. Exams are fair and you will do well if you do the homework's. Professor Childs is very knowledgeable about algorithms and is also able to answer questions and explain concepts very well. Overall, really enjoyed his class.
Jonathan Katz CMSC451 Expecting a B Anonymous 12/19/2020	He has good lectures but this person genuinely does not care about any of his students. He does not want to spend any second on logistics and his replies to piazza posts are very irritating to say the least. I would not take him again. And grades? He says everybody should get an A and does not curve. Grading is not clear at all! We never know what the cutoffs were, we never knew what grades we had until we saw them on Testudo. A complete failure of a professor in my opinion. He also asked if us so many times not to email him. He even said he will not respond to any emails. He genuinely does not want to teach in my opinion.
Jonathan Katz CMSC451 Expecting a B- Anonymous 12/18/2020	I would not take him again because he seems to genuinely not care about any of his students. He has good and interesting lectures but it seems like he doesn't want to spend a second of his time outside of class for the class. Maybe this impression is unique to me but I felt like he didn't care about the students and didn't want to be bothered.
Jonathan Katz CMSC451 Expecting an A+ Anonymous 12/18/2020	Textbook definition of a good professor. - Answers Piazza posts quickly - Lecture is clear, provides lots of examples - Handled the transition to COVID online learning very well - HW's were relevant - Exams were reflective of HW's and class material 10/10 would take again.
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Expecting an A- Anonymous 05/21/2020	While the content of this course is interesting the organizing and implementation is severely lacking. Professors and TA's should respond to students in a timely manner but in this class there was seldom any communication with the students on basic course information
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Expecting a B Anonymous 05/08/2020	Truly garbage. Doesn't teach anything--and what's worse--doesn't seem to care. Terrible organization and complete apathy.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting a C wshipper 12/21/2019	Andrew Childs is such an amazing professor. He is clear and calm in his lectures, always willing to re-explain material, and his homeworks and exams are very fair. Not easy, but fair. When I had him, he took notes on an iPad and displayed them on the board as he taught, to show many examples and explain theorems. However, he didn't post those notes - so make sure you take your own! Overall, I would want no one else to teach me 451. I feel like I actually learned a lot. I wish he would teach 351 as well!
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting a B+ Anonymous 12/21/2019	the course is pretty hard in general. there were a lot of smart people when i took the course and exam averages were in the high 60s. but as for andrew childs himself, if you can take this class with him, do it. he is a great lecturer. while he might be fast at times he does address student questions during class. i went to his office hours fairly often and i got a lot of my questions answered and i overall learned a lot in this class. it's a challenge and bit stressful since the final is worth 45% but i think if you did well in 351 (B or higher) and you're interested in learning more about algorithms then take this class with childs.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 12/20/2019	Probably one of the best professors to have for a difficult class. He almost instantly replies to all Piazza posts, has great lectures, and he is very kind. This class was hard but the material I learned from it was invaluable and absolutely essential for any CS student.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting a C+ Anonymous 12/19/2019	Childs is insanely smart; he, for the most part, single-handedly managed the course Piazza. He writes his notes (on an iPad projected to the screen) in a way that students can copy word for word, which is nice when we need to review the concepts, but makes class a frantic effort to copy notes (missing a lot of what Childs has to say verbally). His final was pretty fair in my opinion. He sticks very close to the book "Algorithm Design" (available as a PDF online). 451 is a tough class. I guess it will improve some algorithmic thinking skills.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting a C Anonymous 12/14/2019	Childs is probably the best professor I have ever had out of all the other CMSC professors next to Max for 423. Hands down takes the best notes, is easy to follow in class, and he is really interesting (his field of study is quantum algorithms). The only sort-of complaint I have is he doesn't post his notes online, but that never really bothered me and you definitely learn a lot when you're at lecture. More importantly however is how hard this class is. Yes, the first half of the class is 351 material, but with 2 week long assignments and a final that is worth almost half your grade, the class has very little room to make up for lost points easily due to its structure. I will say the class was harder than 351 for me, as I had Golub for 351 and received a B at the end, and I wasn't the best at proofs coming in to this class. My advice is if you are VERY confident in your ability to solve proofs then you should definitely take Childs; he's absolutely the best professor for this class. It honestly all comes down to how confident you feel about taking 451. P.S: I'm giving 5 stars because Childs is AMAZING, not because of the course material or its difficulty.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 11/28/2019	Incredible professor. His lectures are very clear and the expectations for students are very reasonable. This is a challenging class, but it's worth taking because you'll learn a ton.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Anonymous 07/08/2019	Pros: He is very smart Cons: You'll never be as smart as he is The class is genuinely difficult He is a very boring lecturer
Aravind Srinivasan CMSC451 Anonymous 06/11/2019	Pretty good professor. Cares about his students and is interesting enough. Much better run class than 351 for sure.
Aravind Srinivasan CMSC451 Expecting a C+ Anonymous 05/14/2019	It is clear that Aravind has a vast knowledge of algorithms, and is very passionate about the subject as well. He teaches the course via lectures based off of the recommended textbook, following very closely to the examples and ideas from the chapters he tells you that you must understand. I found the lectures, if you pay attention, to be very interesting and relevant. As for assignments, the course had 5 homework assignments, each giving you a deeper understanding of the topics covered in the past few lectures. They were graded moderately harshly. The mid terms were pretty difficult and took the entire class time to complete for almost all of the class. None of the questions were unfair or anything he hadn't covered, and if you do the book problems and redo the homework assignments the tests are manageable.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting a B Anonymous 05/19/2018	Great professor. No slides, but excellent lectures with clear notes on the board.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 05/18/2018	Great at lecturing. I learned a lot.
Andrew Childs CMSC451 cnaka 03/30/2018	Good professor but has very high expectations for students.
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Anonymous 11/12/2015	I strongly felt the particular content of this course is best (and easiest) learned through his whiteboard style rather than by book. Clyde covers a TON of ground in one lecture's time, especially when compared to professors who just read off a watered-down powerpoint from the book for their entire class "lecture". The big caveat is if you have a lot of trouble following (at least roughly) what he's doing, it won't be much fun for you and you will feel lost all lecture. Either way you need to write down literally everything he does. The material can be hard to grasp, but Clyde is really great at walking through an algorithm. If you take good notes and review them (possibly with another classmate/TA) you will eventually understand it. The other most important thing to do in this class is to ask questions when something isn't clear. In each class there's usually 2-6 little insights he forgets to mention, if you can catch those omissions and get him to explain them, you are a hero and it will be tremendously insightful for you and for every other student in the room. Although if you still don't get his explanation, you may need to just let it go- and if you took good notes, you should eventually understand it when you are reviewing them later.
Samir Khuller CMSC451 Expecting a C- Anonymous 10/13/2015	Moderately chill dude. Should've failed this class, but my man came through with an epic review sesh.
Samir Khuller CMSC451 mario_451 10/13/2015	A very chill dude.
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Expecting a B Anonymous 05/15/2012	Kruskal is great in this course. His policy on homework is great (hand it in whenever, no real due dates). You just have to make sure to keep yourself on top of it so you don't fall behind. HW is good practice of the concepts. Exams are tough, but that's to be expected for this type of course. The questions are fair. Most importantly, Kruskal makes the course very interesting by motivating the topics very well. He is also very good at explaining stuff, but you have to make sure to ASK him questions. Otherwise, he will breeze through the material and you won't understand anything. He is decent for help in office hours too. My only complaint would be that he seems a little disorganized (just try visiting his office for example). However, he never lost any of my work, so this is not a big issue.
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Expecting an A Anonymous 01/24/2012	This course was super fun! Easily my favorite course taken at UMD so far. It's a panorama of cool stuff in algorithms- I was continually surprised with intuitive tricks that are simple to explain but probably took months each to develop. They're priceless drips of distilled knowledge that you can't afford to miss if you're a CS major who plans to stop at your bachelor's degree. Kruskal communicates the course content clearly and with a refined taste for what's interesting. He seemed to care less about grades than most other professors, and gave a ridiculous curve. His marking is merciless though- if you do something wrong on a problem then you can expect a 0 or 50% grade for that problem. The tests were hard, especially the final which was very hard. He puts heavy emphasis on proofs.
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Expecting an A xenonscreams 01/11/2012	My only real complaint about Kruskal is that he's probably too smart for his own good. Unfortunately, that impacts his teaching significantly. It's frustrating when he insists on only proving things a specific way, and this is the only class I've ever taken in which I really felt like I had to ask questions. The exams were worth most of the grade which made it a little scary. But if you really do all of the homework on your own and study well, you should do well on the exams (at least relative to other people, which is what matters in this course with regards to your grade). Definitely go over all of the homework questions before taking the exams, and maybe do a few questions from the book. Kruskal is very accommodating and cares a lot about his students. He clearly wants to see them do well. I definitely learned a lot in this course and was adequately rewarded for my efforts. It just takes a lot of getting used to his teaching style, and several hours doing and reviewing problems to prepare for the exams.
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Expecting a B Anonymous 07/07/2011	Class is hard so do not skip any lectures. There were only 4 homeworks but they were challenging and were used on the exams. Midterm was 40%, homeworks 10%, final 50% of grade. Many people drop this class because of his no-regard-for-human-life grading style. I thought I'd fail with a 55 average on the midterm and final exam, but with his curve that was a B.
Clyde Kruskal CMSC451 Expecting an A random 06/08/2010	Kruskal is a great guy. I have had couple of classes with him, and I think he is definitely one of the better professors in the department. His class is entertaining and educational at the same time. Mind you, 451 is a hard class. You learn many complex classes of algorithms, and their mastery can only happen over time. The good thing is Kruskal understands this. His tests aren't super hard if you go through and understand his lectures well. He doesn't give very organized notes (mostly writing on board). Also, there were couple of times when he stumbled a bit solving some problem. But on the whole, I would recommend taking this any/all algorithms classes with him. Also has a decent grade curve. But go into this class prepared to see some really hard problems.
David Mount CMSC451 Expecting an A fuzzyLogic 12/28/2008	Great lectures and lecture notes. Comprehensive, lucid, and insightful best described the class. Homework was challenging but quite interesting. Exams were likewise challenging but definitely not impossible if you understood the material. There's a lot of non-linear thinking involved which is not too uncommon for proof-based mathematics courses but may surprise those coming from a traditional CS background.