Reviews for MATH464

Information Review
Shiferaw Berhanu
MATH464

Expecting an A+
Anonymous
05/23/2025
There are alot of good things to say about this class. It is extremely clear that Dr. Berhanu is extremely enthusiastic about the material he teaches, which is extremely refreshing (at least for me). Also, the grading was the fastest I had ever experienced out of any class I had taken (all exams including the final were graded within 3 hours of the test being taken and all homeworks were graded within one day of the deadline). Each exam had a healthy amount of review questions (around 10 for midterms and 20 for the final). The review questions were consistently more difficult than the exam ones so studying those often made me overprepared for exams. There is one gripe I have with this class. First is the fact that the only way to get course material is through lectures (basically no assigned textbook) and the lectures were not recorded. This means that missing lectures could really impact the ability to succeed in this class. In conclusion, go to lectures and this class is fine.
Shiferaw Berhanu
MATH464

Expecting an A+
Anonymous
05/22/2025
As others have mentioned, the current experience taking Dr. Berhanu's class is far from that described in his Math410 reviews. He cares deeply about students' learning and engagement, and all assignments and exams were very reasonable considering the wealth of exercises given in homeworks, lectures, and exam reviews. Also, exams are graded within a few hours, and are graded considerably fairly. One note is that attendance should be considered mandatory and students should avoid showing up late when possible.
Shiferaw Berhanu
MATH464

Expecting an A
Anonymous
05/22/2025
Prof. Berhanu understands that this class is taken by both math majors with experience and engineering majors who have little to no previous experience in formal math concepts needed for MATH464. He walks through every new concept and introduces material as necessary, while avoiding bloating the course material. In addition, the exams and homework are very straightforward and application-based, which is invaluable for engineering. He goes over application in class, unlike most math professors, so studying isn't a mad scramble for finding examples on how to do real problems. If you're an engineering major who wants to get an actual deep understanding of Fourier Analysis and beyond, I highly recommend this class.
Shiferaw Berhanu
MATH464

Expecting a B-
Anonymous
05/19/2025
Excellent lecturer that cares about student's learning. Put a lot of effort into this class and you will walk out as a more informed individual. He is generous and reasonable with HW and exams.
Shiferaw Berhanu
MATH464

Expecting an A
Anonymous
05/17/2025
Berhanu is a good professor that's passionate about the course. The review problems he provides are very helpful for doing well on exams, they are slightly more challenging but still doable and representative of the content. A small critique is that he goes through proofs very fast and it can be tough to keep up.
Radu Balan
MATH464

Expecting an A+
Anonymous
06/24/2024
Course is pretty easy but very time consuming; balan is an awful lecturer and it's much more effective to just read the textbook rather than go to lecture. He does give out a study guide before the midterm and the final, which is helpful, but the final is 50% of your grade which is quite stressful. I would recommend taking this class with another professor.
Radu Balan
MATH464

Expecting a C+
Anonymous
05/16/2024
Do not expect a curve. Professor is good. You are not over worked but the homework are very challenging. -1 midterm -homework per week (avg 8-12hr commitment) Content is pretty deep but fun. His class is a gpa killer thats the biggest setback.
Radu Balan
MATH464

Expecting an A+
Anonymous
05/14/2024
His lectures aren't very good; he usually starts by explaining a concept briefly and then doing an example. These parts usually make sense, but then afterwards he starts to ramble about different extensions of the problem, which becomes extremely confusing. It also doesn't help that he mumbles at the board a lot so it's hard to make out what he's saying. In terms of grading, he's extremely lenient though, as homework assignments are basically a free 100 for submission. His midterm and final were extremely straightforward and made up 75% of your overall grade. If you can do the homework for the class, the midterm and final are free As. The textbook does help a lot with understanding the material, but it does go extremely theoretical with its explanations. Also, Balan tends to reuse test questions from his past tests, so reviewing from testbank is really effective.
Radu Balan
MATH464

Expecting a B
Anonymous
04/01/2024
Lectures can be difficult to follow as he trails off into mumbling or side tangents into content that isn't relevant to the coursework. Coursework is designed to be encouraging memorizing trivia rather than memorizing problem solving tools. If you are an extreme math enthusiast and spend 20+ hours a week studying and understanding the content, he will be a decent professor. If you are a normal student with a life and other things to worry about, avoid this professor.
Todd Rowland
MATH464

Anonymous
05/20/2023
Super nice professor.
Todd Rowland
MATH464

Expecting an A
Anonymous
12/23/2021
He hosted office hours 4/5 days of the week and provides practice exams for each midterm and the final. The grading on tests is very fair, and the lowest homework and half of lowest midterm were dropped. The only criticism I would give is that the lecture was not very engaging and there was too much emphasis on computer demonstrations in Mathematica.
Tobias von Petersdorff
MATH464

Anonymous
05/18/2021
At the beginning of the semester there were quizzes based on each class, which was fine, but those stopped after the first few weeks. The problem was there were almost no practice problems or homework's the entire semester. He decided to assign our only homework during finals weeks and it was worth 30% of our grade. He finally provided a few practice problems for the final exam, but most of the class was unprepared for the final since we'd had almost no other practice with the material all semester. Although the theory was well explained, he did almost no examples in class, so no one in the class really learned anything. The whole semester was basically a waste. Would not take this guy again or advise anyone who wants to learn the material NOT to take him.
Kasso Okoudjou
MATH464

Expecting an A
skinter
05/21/2012
First of all: accent and handwriting are difficult at first, but most people were able to get used to it; if you can't, find a different prof. Otherwise, Prof Okoudjou is excellent. Explains fully, very helpful with questions. Exams extremely straightforward and he did a ton of practice for them. Strongly recommended.
Wojciech Czaja
MATH464

Expecting a B
Anonymous
12/02/2010
Czaja did a very good job of explaining the conceptual basis of Fourier, wavelet, and wavelet packet transforms. He also did a good job of keeping the target of any proof present in the students' minds, but sometimes proofs were a little hard to follow anyway, and some proofs left me with a feeling of "so what" afterward (that is, some proofs seemed to add nothing substantial to my understanding of the nature of the proven proposition - I would've been content with accepting a statement as true and perhaps seeing some cases of it being true or a brief explanation of the gist of the proof). It was also a little hard for me to discern what the instructor expected us to be learning at any given moment. It seemed the exams often were not clearly connected to lecture material (usually there was relevant class material that one could use to solve exam problems, but problems were often presented with notation that hadn't been used in class, such as the use of "inverse Fourier transform" instead of "synthesis formula", so some extra cognitive overhead had to be taken into account). Also, as a student who had no prior experience with Matlab, homework assignments to be complete in Matlab seemed a bit open-ended (though I scored highly on all the ones I've received back), and most of my challenge with the homework came not from my lack of understanding of the mathematical nature of any given transform but rather from particular difficulties of implementing them in Matlab (converting infinite sums over finitely supported sequences into finite sums, making sure that indices of sequences always started at 1 so that calls of values from a sequence would work, etc.). Overall, I learned a lot, and I thought a lot about transforms, but I also spent a lot of time thinking about things that seemed to have little to do with transforms.