Natasha Cabrera

This professor has taught: EDHD228, EDHD411, EDHD412, EDHD415, EDHD419B, EDHD498G, EDHD629, EDHD690, EDHD720, EDHD750, EDHD751, HNUH258B, HONR228R

Sort By:

Information	Review
Natasha Cabrera HNUH258B Expecting an A+ Anonymous 12/10/2024	Would not recommend if you want a valuable course, but if you need an easy A, this professor is fine and nice. Especially with the TA. Didn't come to class on Mondays because she was schedule for a different class (kind of suspicious). Cons: - I think the course should go deeper into trends that are not intuitive. For example, "more money into interventions = better outcomes" is a very obvious correlation. But answering questions like "what interventions are ineffective? what interventions are counter-productive? what interventions only have positive impact for a specific demographic?" would be much more valuable. - I think the student presentations could be interesting, but the rubric made students always do a Kahoot at the end. This got old because knowing the specifics of a particular research study wasn't actually valuable. - The instructor got distracted too often, repeated the same things. The quizzes started too late and I would have to stay late (had a class right after) to finish the quiz which is not fair. - The syllabus talks about how every week the content builds on the previous. But I did not feel this at all. I felt more like I was just coming to class for 1 hour and 15 minutes twice a week to listen to someone else speak, and then left. I felt like I didn't have an incentive to participate in class or read the research papers. The research papers we were assigned should be a larger part of the discussion. - Class ended early too often (should be basically never) - Office hours should be more than just 1 hour a week and should specify an end time (I didn't know it was 5:00). Ideally also a Zoom option. Best parts of class and instructor: - Parenting interventions - Our own research literature analysis - Comparing poverty to other countries - Guest speakers
Natasha Cabrera HNUH258B Expecting an A+ Anonymous 12/09/2024	Dr. Cabrera and Pinar are two of the sweetest people I've ever met in my life. They are so passionate about human development and childhood poverty, and it really shows in the way they teach. There's one in-class assignment a week and it's so chill -- show up and you'll get the 100%. There are "pop quizzes," but it's so light and we usually don't even have them. You don't need to read the assigned articles, but you can if your heart really desires. Anyways, take this class, it's great. Dr. C also brought us ice-cream because she was sad one day, so like actually take this class.
Natasha Cabrera HNUH258B Expecting an A+ Anonymous 12/01/2024	Dr. Cabrera is that girl!!! She's sooo random and she made me laugh. Her class is mad boring though I was fighting for my life every day. No one really participates and it was really awkward at times. The class was also lowkey really disorganized and lectures were mainly the professor going on long tangents. But like I said, the tangents had me ijboling. Other than that, the class was pretty easy. The weekly quizzes were light, and I didn't do most of assigned readings. The main assignments were also graded pretty lightly. Would I take this class again? I wouldn't say that I would. But I think it's one of the better UH cluster classes.
Natasha Cabrera HNUH258B Expecting an A Anonymous 12/15/2023	I do feel bad dropping a 2 star review on Dr. Cabrera because she is such a nice and innocent lady. She's really funny and friendly and I love her as a person. But she really has no business being a professor. Like other reviews say, she is unimaginably scatterbrained and I feel like she has no idea what she is saying even as she is saying it. She just talks. I feel like I learned nothing from this class. If she asked a question to the class and someone asked her to repeat it, she would simply not remember what she asked. It could be a second after and she wouldn't know. The class structure was abysmal. Granted, it's the first semester she's ever taught it, but it was horrid. Mind you, we were freshmen and sophomores in University Honors and most likely NOT developmental psyc majors. Every week, we had to read 2-3 peer reviewed research articles in their entirety and post discussion posts just summarizing the readings and the classic "reply to at least one other person". Then we would barely talk about the articles in class. The discussion posts contribute to some overall participation grade, supposedly, but it's unclear exactly what that looks like. We also had to "find a media article related to the topics for the week" each week and bring it to class to discuss each Monday--we probably "discussed our media articles" for like 3 out of the 15 Mondays. Also, big problem, every Wednesday class was entirely devoted to a student group presentation on the research articles for the week. Everyone hated the articles and had trouble comprehending them because they are GRADUATE LEVEL READINGS in developmental psyc and economics, so these group presentations were always the dryest and worst presentations I've ever seen. I do not place that at the fault of the students-- it was a stupid idea to make us read them and try and talk about them in the first place. We had a 5 page reaction paper that was pretty easy mid-semester. Just had to give your opinion and do a little reading. Now. The research paper. The final project for this course is for each student to individually reach out to some community poverty organization and interview a few people who run the organization and write a research paper comparing the interview findings to the things we had "learned" in class. I actually fully support the idea of this project but it was structured kind of poorly and not nearly enough emphasis was placed on it during class time. The rubric for the paper itself was also vague. Her organization of the class was just bad in general. There was one really chaotic class period towards the end of the semester where we were trying to figure out what the rest of the class was going to look like, and she basically had no idea what we were going to do or what she had written in the syllabus. It turned out her syllabus completely neglected the existence of an entire week. The class began going off the rails because she kept giving mixed signals on what we were going to do and a couple students had to pull up the syllabus and tell her what she had written. This is a perfect example of the nightmarish organization that the class faced. TL;DR: Dr. Cabrera is a really kind and friendly lady who will make you laugh but really should not be teaching college students. She is far too disorganized and absentminded to keep the class's structure together. She loves her area of study and clearly knows a lot about it but I did not enjoy her as a teacher. TL;DR (HNUH258B Specific): This class sucks compared to a lot of the other UH classes. I would still say it's worth it to be able to take HNUH258U with Riva, because Riva is perfect, but this class was pretty awful. It's a lot of really advanced academic reading (100 pages per week, usually) and a structural nightmare. However, she grades extremely leniently and I think she does cut us a lot of slack in grading things, but still the expectations are a bit much and the organization is horrid.
Natasha Cabrera EDHD412 Expecting an A Anonymous 05/18/2023	She's def passionate about the topic. Reading quizzes and in-class assignments every week. 1 midterm and 1 final and you are allowed to bring in a notecard so it's not that bad. Getting an A is very possible.
Natasha Cabrera EDHD412 Expecting an A Anonymous 05/08/2023	I think she is an interesting professor, she just kind of talks and it makes lectures engaging. However, we don't follow a real structure in class, and we lack slides and overall organization. This makes the exams hard. I do think this class was enjoyable regardless of its disorganization.
Natasha Cabrera EDHD412 Anonymous 01/18/2023	One of my least favorite classes. She makes almost no effort to make class engaging, and if she does its a complete waste of time and almost unrelated to material. Very scatter brained and can't work a computer to save her life. Her exams aren't even directly related to class material, I took those exams and studied for them by going through the old powerpoint but sat down and felt like I knew nothing. No one did well on those exams. Also unfortunately I met some of the dumbest people in this class, I took it as an elective and it felt like more than half of the students were dumb as rocks. Being in that class for 3 hours made me lose brain cells. Sweet lady, awful professor, awful class. She should not have a teaching job at this level in my opinion. This class is a joke in general and I beg you to not waste your time.
Natasha Cabrera EDHD210 Expecting a B+ Anonymous 12/17/2011	Professor Cabrera has been hands down one of my least favorite professors. She is EXTREMELY scatter brained and it is impossible to follow her in class. Not to mention she is extremely boring and sitting through a three hour class with her is pure torture. She doesn't specify criteria for papers and is horrible and grading them in a timely matter and is a very hard grader. She's very unresponsive to student concerns and I can honestly say that I learned nothing from her. Avoid her if you can.