Kimberly Paczolt

This professor has taught: BSCI150, BSCI151, BSCI222, CPSP218L

Sort By:

Information	Review
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A- Anonymous 11/11/2024	She does not make lecture content digestible whatsoever, she is also very condescending when you go to ask her follow up questions on topics. She does upload all of her lectures on panopto which is nice. Exams are very hard and really test your deep understand of material. You are expected to know every detail otherwise you will get multiple points off of exams. Do not recommend, TAKE ANY OTHER PROFESSOR
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting a B+ Anonymous 11/04/2024	Dr. Paczolt clearly is passionate about genetics, and is passionate about teaching students who are too. The reality is, she is a HORRIBLE person, and does not care about you in the slightest, despite claiming multiple times throughout the semester that she does. It is a shame, I've attended plenty of her office hours where she complains that "students must not want help or want to do good in this course, because nobody shows up to my office hours" when in reality nobody shows up because she makes everybody feel like an IDIOT. In all my years of school, even having a few subpar professors, I have never had a professor that was blatantly rude and condescending AND wanted her students to feel less than. She must just be going through something in her personal life, but that is no reason to treat students the way she does. I wanted so badly to like her, but I cannot for the simple fact that she treats anyone below her like crap. I do like her lecture style and how she records and uploads all lectures to panapto-- That is cruical if you want to do any type of decent on the exams. All in all, don't bother going to HER office hours, you are better off going to TA (your own and other TA's) office hours and GSS if you can.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI150 Expecting an A Anonymous 10/07/2024	Paczolt is a wolf in sheep's clothing. A good professor would want to teach students, but it seems like she loathes doing so. She uses excessive jargon and equivocation in her lectures. A good professor would find the simplest way to communicate lessons to their students, but she makes her life and everyone's life around her difficult. She is always having a perennial bad day and she makes it obvious how much she hates to teach. She usually doesn't like answering questions and frequently gets crass when someone asks her a question; she seems to be in a rush and genuinely uninterested. She is the death of curiosity and imagination for biology students.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting a B+ Anonymous 07/12/2024	Horrific professor. Her rating is fitting. Her slides are filled with insignificant details that have nothing to do with the main concepts. She is ridiculously condescending and rude. She has no empathy for students and borderline hides due dates thanks to her unorganized Canvas page. She also belittles students for asking questions. Fairly confident she doesn't actually understand genetics herself because of how unorganized her class is. Don't get me wrong, Genetics is fun to learn, there's a lot of interesting things but this professor makes it unbearable.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A Anonymous 07/07/2024	Disclaimer: I took BSCI222 over the summer, which means that my exams were open-note and the course itself was paced much, much faster. I realize that means that if I had taken Dr. Paczolt’s class during the Fall or Spring, I might have had a radically different experience. Personally, I found Dr. Paczolt’s recorded lectures to be pretty informative, but very, very slow—I put her on 1.5x to focus, and I had to get through an hour and half of lecture material almost everyday. There’s a lot of content and assignments in a short period of time, and I struggled a little to keep up, especially since a lot of it was graded for accuracy. The exams are difficult, to be honest, but if you watch her lectures and write down everything she says, you’re golden. Discussions were fine—the exam review was helpful because we broke down practice problems. I didn’t go to OH because I was working full time, but from her live lectures, I think she came off as friendly and personable. She was always already to answer questions. Overall, I enjoyed her class and I think it was structured pretty well.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting a B+ Anonymous 07/01/2024	AVOID THIS PROFESSOR AT ALL COSTS. She is absolutely ridiculous. She has absolutely no empathy for her students and is extremely condescending. She is unbelievably rude and intentionally hides her due dates so that students would miss the assignments. I had two biologists tutor me for this class, one who received their PhD in genetics and another who conducts research in genetics. Both agreed that Paczolt does not know what she is talking about and has absolutely no idea how to teach. Instead of teaching main concepts (that are actually interesting) she would rather you memorize insignificant details for an exam which she gives you absolutely no time for. On top of that, TA Noah needs to fix his attitude problem. He is equally as condescending as Paczolt. DO NOT TAKE PACZOLT.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A Anonymous 05/19/2024	She's not a bad professor but the class is so much work and the exams are pretty fair but there are a lot of trick questions so you have to have a very deep understanding of the material. She provides plenty of resources that will help you prepare for the exams and the discussions are the best for learning the material.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A+ Anonymous 05/18/2024	Dr. Paczolt is extremely passionate about genetics and provides more than enough resources for success in this course. She uploads topic PowerPoints, outlines, lecture recordings, and extra YouTube videos that supplement her lectures, which was so helpful. The review sessions in discussion also come in handy when it comes to the exams and her exams correctly reflect the information that is covered in the topics. She also has topic quizzes, homeworks, and 222torial assignments that further supplement her lecture content and I found all of these resources very helpful when studying for the exams and the final. There are no curves, but she gave extra credit assignments. The final was also all multiple choice and comprehensive, which allowed me to prioritize studying for the newer topics. Overall, if you spend the time to understand the concept by making connections to other previous knowledge from other classes or topics, rather than memorizing, it will help you out in the long run.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A Anonymous 05/17/2024	I'm genuinely baffled by Dr. Paczolt's rating. This class was my favorite of the semester: she's an interesting and engaging lecturer, the most organized professor I've ever had, and has really good review built into the class. It's a info-dense class but she's not unfair at all and provides a lot of resources to study. The textbook wasn't necessary which I liked. I didn't find her condescending at all or fast-paced considering the sheer amount of information that's in this course. Also, the number of assignments is super manageable and helped me study because it was built into the class, so instead of spending hours reviewing for an exam with no credit, you actually get points for doing studying which helped my grade a lot. I barely spent any time on this class other than going to lecture/discussion and studying for the exams a couple of days in advance. Definitely recommend for people who need a good lecturer to pass a class!
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A Anonymous 05/09/2024	This is a very honest review of Dr. P. Class structure: Dr. P is a very organized lecturer and records all of her lectures so students can look back at them to study or if they miss class. During lecture, it is very important that you write down what she says (examples, extended explanations, etc). They are very helpful and will often appear on exams. This class is content heavy, you should come in expecting to learn a LOT but if you put in the time and effort and if you use ACTIVE RECALL methods, this class will be manageable. Exams: Exams are very fair and she gives out a past practice exam which has an identical structure so it's very helpful to know what type of questions will be asked. PAY ATTENTION to what she emphasizes in class, if she spends a lot of time on a certain topic or problem, it WILL be on the exam. The exam is split into 3 parts: multiple choice questions, some long response questions, and 10 short responses (you are allowed to skip 1). It is a time crunch so I would make sure to be very familiar with the content and be able to do problems quickly. She gives extra credit on all exams which is really helpful because they are often easier. The final is all multiple choice and only covers content on your previous exams so it's easier to study for. Again, if you put in the effort and study correctly (not just rewriting notes and rewatching lecture), it will be okay. Also, BE SPECIFIC in your answers, details are very important! Resources: Dr. P is always there to answer questions and her TAs are all really nice. She also posts Topic Outlines and I would HIGHLY recommend you use them because they are very helpful and often give clear explanations on each topic. Again, she gives out past practice exams and you should take them under test conditions because they give you a very honest review on where you're at. Assignments: You have topic quizzes after each topic and the questions are easier than what's on the exam. Its a good way to gauge your current understanding on the topic. HW is not a guaranteed 100%, you have to be specific in your answers if you want full points. There are other small assignments that are usually 100%. Discussion: Pretty standard, you work on a project and you also do review sessions before exams which are very helpful. Discussion assignments are also not a guaranteed 100%, you have to be specific. Don't be afraid to ask your TA questions, it will prevent you from losing points in your answers! Overall Dr. P is a great professor, I want to emphasize that this class is VERY content heavy and there is a lot of information to get through and know. If you prioritize this class and really spend the time and effort to study, I believe that it is manageable. There are tons of resources and extra credit to help boost your grade. Be specific in your answers, you really need to know your stuff and can't brush off certain things. This class is challenging but Dr. P provides ample resources and practice and she is a great choice as a professor.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting a B+ Anonymous 04/23/2024	I will not take her ever again. Regardless of the difficulty of this course in general she was just not understanding with her students at all. She doesn't know how to teach the material and her exams are always way more difficult than needed to be. She speaks very rudely with you when you have any problems that cause you to miss class, even when you have documentation. She is quite literally the most unreasonable person I've met and she thinks her class is the only class we are taking. I would not recommend taking her at all. Take anyone else.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A Anonymous 03/08/2024	All the reviews here are horribly unfair. If you put in an adequate amount of work, you will be fine. The class is expectedly dense, but that is the nature of Genetics as a topic, and less so indicative of the professor itself. She provides enough material to be successful, and the exams are very fair. Study hard!! The exam format is not bad, and there is no essay writing or anything like that. She always provides bonuses on her exams as well, which sometimes are just free points. Discussion is a little unrelated, but overall not hard either. Study her words carefully, make flashcards, and you will be fine.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A+ Anonymous 12/16/2023	BSCI222 is an information-packed class and it can be hard to keep up with the content. However, Dr. Paczolt gives you plenty of resources for you to be able to succeed. She posts her lecture recordings, has very helpful topic outlines, posts a practice exam before every midterm, is great at answering questions in class or during office hours, and keeps up with discussion board questions. She even holds an extra office hour before exams. Some other reviews referred to her lectures as an information dump, but that's just because there is so much content to cover that Dr. Paczolt has to keep to a strict schedule to finish everything before the semester ends. I actually liked her lecture style; she spoke clearly and was very thorough in explaining the content. Her lecture recordings are especially helpful for catching the details you may have missed the first time around. The coursework was not too overwhelming; she assigned a topic quiz to be completed after each topic (4 topics per midterm), and 2 homework assignments and a practice exam due before each midterm. There was also an occasional short MathBench or 222torial Quiz due. The practice exam was graded on completion, but all others were on accuracy, and every one of these assignments was take-home and online. All of these assignments are useful in preparing for her exam as they showcase the types of questions included in her exams. Her exam grading is fair and she gives out plenty of extra credit to boost your grade. I've heard from my classmates that time can be tight on the midterms, but I feel like if you know the content well, they are completely doable within the timeframe. Her final is all multiple-choice and easier than the midterms, so time shouldn't be an issue there. Discussion sessions could be split into Gene Labs and Exam Review and they are all mandatory. The Gene Labs were interesting and allowed you to see the applications of the content learned in lecture, but weren't particularly helpful for learning the content itself. The exam review sessions were a great way to prepare for exams though. How I studied: Before each topic quiz, I would rewatch the lecture recordings for that topic at double speed. For the homework assignments, I would go through it once closed-note, then go through it again open-note and mark down what I got wrong before submitting. I always checked my practice exam against the practice exam keys and marked down what I got wrong. Before midterms/finals, I would read over the topic outlines and review the quizzes/homeworks covered in that exam. The topic outlines are extremely helpful when preparing for the exams. Flashcards would also be useful since there are a lot of terms to remember. Other helpful resources would be GSS and the discussion review slides. On average, I'd say I spent 2-3 hours per week on coursework and 10 hours per midterm studying.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A Anonymous 12/15/2023	I do not think Paczolt herself is as bad as people say she is... She can sound condescending, but I feel like it's not even on purpose? She can definitely be rude to those asking questions during lecture, whether she realizes it or not. It's not really her fault that there is so much material, although I don't like how we will still be learning material the week of the exam (I guess it can't be helped). I never went to office hours though, so I can't say that much about who she is as a person. But… I feel like there are definitely worse professors in terms of manners and how they treat students. If you are like me and can't pay attention during in-person lecture, she records everything on ponopto, and you should just watch those videos instead. This course has a lot of content and complicated concepts, so you shouldn't take any difficult courses along with this one if you can help it. She likes to include weird trick questions in her topic quizzes which is annoying... her exams are multiple choice and a bunch of free response. You can skip one free response question, but you need to answer each question relatively quickly. Exam averages were in the high 60's, low 70's. No curve. There is some extra credit on every exam, and if there was a low exam average she might give out more. The free response is tricky, you need to include certain key words/phrases to get points but it's not explicitly stated what those phrases are. The exams are based on what she says during lecture - I got a good grade because I basically copied down every word she said and studied it (which is why the lecture recordings are so helpful). If she mentions a small detail you think is irrelevant, it will probably be a question on the next exam. Discussion includes two weeks of exam review for every exam, which honestly is very helpful. The final is cumulative but is made up of slightly altered versions of the questions from the midterms, so it is easier to study for it. It is also all multiple choice. Most assignments are graded based on correctness - homework, quizzes, genelab, etc., and I found the topic quizzes and homework questions tricky at times (I literally never got full points on a homework assignment even though it isn't timed lol). Study plans and practice exams are graded on completion though!
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting a B Anonymous 12/08/2023	Horrifically bad professor with no real sense of course planning or empathy for the student side. I never usually review courses or professors but made an account just to warn other students against taking her if you can. She jams 15 topics worth of content into a semester which can really only fit 12-13 based on the assignment load and pace she lectures at. Her course planning is so bad that for example now, on a Friday before exam week (our final exam is next Thursday and last day of classes is this upcoming Monday) she still has to finish Topics 14 and introduce/finish Topic 15 which will make up half of the final. The assignment load is another point to mention, she assigns so many assignments that many times I find myself having to sit through finishing them for the week so I can have my schedule clear to actually study the material. Homework quizzes, online tutorials and quizzes, lengthy and niche “GeneLab” assignments which culminate in a presentation for the semester’s work, topic quizzes, study plans, practice exams, and on and on. Not to mention the mandatory 2 hour discussions every week to just load even more onto you. Her perspective of what her course is like as a student is nonexistent and she is so solipsistic I don’t think she even cares. Maybe in her mind she doesn’t view the student-teacher relationship as being a two way street where both have to meet in the middle but one where the students have no other obligations in life but her class and will robotically complete everything mandated of them. I think in her mind she thinks all of these babysitting/busywork assignments serve a function but for most students it is counterproductive and just serve as more opportunities to lose points throughout the semester. Not to mention how harsh and pedantic her grading on assignments are but she is so stubborn she won’t even listen to your take because her word is gospel. Her exams are another point which I could dedicate an entire post to because they are so specific, misleading, and unfair. She asks open ended free response questions which require specific answers down to the exact term. Her past exam was so bad she even had to give an extra credit quiz today to try to remediate that but still lacks any reflection for why that may be and blames the Thanksgiving break for it (lol). To top it all off she’s a very rude person who will be annoyed that a puny undergraduate like you came into her office hours asking to clear up an exam question missed or to ask for clarification about the course or due dates. Avoid her if you can, if not then try not to take any other hard classes in the same semester. It’s really past the point where the University needs to audit the quality of the courses some of these Professors are out here teaching but UMD is UMD so shrug. Good luck if you take her. And don’t trust the good reviews on here for her, she probably wrote them herself.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting a B Anonymous 12/08/2023	Honestly, the course isn't too bad, it's what you expect out of a 4-credit BSCI course. Paczolt is bad in my eyes, I only gave her a 2 because the class was somewhat manageable. She comes off as very passive-aggressive with her responses and it's so annoying to the point I feel like I can't even ask a simple question in the class without being made feel stupid. She records her lectures so trust you don't have to show up to class for other than the exams and discussion periods. The exams I would say are quite hard, the easiest by far was the second exam. If you can take this class with a better professor (better ratings) I would say, go for it. If not just be ready to study hard and memorize a whole bunch of content.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI150 Expecting a B Anonymous 12/06/2023	Professor Paczolt is not a good professor. She honestly does not contribute much to the class. When she gives lectures they are very unorganized and confusing. She isn't good at giving lectures and has a horrible attitude towards her students. Do not take BSCI 151 or 150 thinking it is an easy course that fulfills gen eds the coursework is much harder than it used to be. The exams are no longer open notes and are written on paper. The term papers are easy but are extremely time-consuming. I recommend avoiding this class if you are a STEM major that already has a large work load.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Anonymous 12/04/2023	a lot of material... a lot. exams are very dense with a lot of short answer, and i would recommend just watching the recorded lecture on your own time rather than coming to class (if youre like me and cant pay attention to live lectures) the topic quizzes are actually kind of difficult and are graded on correctness, not completion. the midterm averages have been in the high 60's low 70's. i dont like going to discussion but the exam review is helpful you need to basically copy everything she SAYS verbatim. not just what is on the slide. if she mentions some detail that seems irrelevant, it is probably not irrelevant and it will be a question on a quiz or test. when i say write everything down im NOT PLAYING!!!! but thats what i did. its very tedious but I did well on all the midterms so far. its a lot of work and studying. dont take another difficult class at the same time if you can help it people say she is rude, i will not lie when i say the way she speaks can sound condescending. but i dont think its on purpose...? it almost just feels like how she speaks naturally. i dont think she is EVIL... but ive heard she works her TAs to the bone so i dont know. to me its almost like a weed out class. i think she makes a lot of questions difficult and tricky on purpose so that only people who study hard or are smart do well she does give extra credit though. there is some on every exam, and she may or may not give more depending on how the class is doing
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting a B- Anonymous 10/31/2023	Terrible. Absolutely terrible. DO NOT take her if you don’t have to. Yes, the content is a lot and can be confusing but she does not make it any easier. Her lectures are just dumps and she will not help you if you are going through a personal situation. WORST CLASS IVE TAKEN AT UMD.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A Anonymous 09/25/2023	Great teacher.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A+ Anonymous 09/22/2023	Great Professor. A lot of people underestimate how hard the class is and tend to blame the professor on them not working hard. 10/10 would take again. She records lectures and has extra credit which is also really nice.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting a B Anonymous 05/18/2023	the only way I survived her class was by watching her recorded lecture at home because she can be fast in person and it is really hard to keep up. If you are taking 222 with her make sure you do not have any other hard classes because this class will take 70% of your attention throughout the week and there are so many things you have to do in one week. there is always something to do every day for this class. one thing you need to know about this class is that when you take the exams make sure you are detailed as possible because if you do not use the exact word they need to use, you will get it wrong because they are very harsh graders. you need to study a lot for the exam and make sure you know everything that is going on because they will ask you questions about everything. The only good thing about this class was how her finals included questions from past exams.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Anonymous 05/15/2023	I think Paczolt gets a bad rep because the course has A LOT of material. Not necessarily her fault for it being material packed. She lectures OK and answers questions pretty frequently. Grade scale is very upfront so there is no confusion about grades. Her tests definitely take time to study for but are fair, and once you take the first one you know what she looks for when grading. She also gives decent extra credit in her exams, as well as after if the average was low. Her final is all multiple choice because of the amount of content. Going to GSS/doing GSS worksheets are great ways to study. Discussion is stupid but it helps pad your grade. Overall a decent professor and definitely doesn't deserve the bad rep.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting a B Anonymous 05/11/2023	If you can't memorize over 90 slides of information for one unit, this class is not for you. Her lectures are full of information she expects you to memorize for each exam, and sometimes that's not even helpful because she includes trick questions. This class requires so much studying and even with that, her exam averages are in the low 60s without a curve. Take any other professor if possible.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A- Grua0061 05/05/2023	Genetics is a tough course, it is very content-dense, and going into it I was very nervous (I'm a freshman and had a very bad registration time and ended up going with Paczolt since that was all that was open) entering this class as the reviews for Paczolt were very negative. However, I honestly feel like it's more because the class itself is hard, as I've found Paczolt to be a fairly good professor, especially in comparison to ones from other departments. Her exams are hard, but she gives you all the resources you need to succeed: AN EXTREMELY ORGANIZED ELMS PAGE, an amazing GSS leader (I never miss a worksheet), 222torials help to explain typically confusing topics, she gives practice exams that are not only easy points but EXACT exam style, discussions are completely exam review the two weeks leading up to exams, each module is filled with supplemental materials, module objectives are filled with the key topics of each unit AND SHE RECORDS EVERY LECTURE!!!!! She not only gives out easy points through practice exams, extra credit sections in exams, and study guides, which are graded on completion, but she has offered the opportunity to earn back up to ten points on two of our exams with lower averages than expected and our final is completely multiple choice questions filled with rewritten previous exam questions AND WITH EXTRA CREDIT!!! She may not be great at answering questions during lectures, but she has been very helpful every time I've gone to office hours and I honestly believe she just gets a bad rep. The amount of content covered in genetics is overwhelming, but if you study hard and utilize the resources available you can and will succeed :)
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting a C- Anonymous 04/26/2023	Please please do not take a class with Paczolt ever if you can avoid it. Ask your advisor to take the class another semester if it means you can have another teacher. She loads so much content into lectures and does not explain it very well. Her exams are very very difficult (I think they are unfair considering the level she teaches at in lectures) and many questions are meant to trick you. She is condescending and not compassionate. This class made me want to drop out of college multiple times.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A Anonymous 04/26/2023	Honestly, I liked Dr. Paczolt even though she definitely gets a bad rep. The class is really heavy with information, so I would recommend re-watching lectures (she records them) so you don't miss anything. She gives lots of small assignments to prepare for exams and bring your grade up, and discussion/lab is really helpful. She's a really nice person, I think people just get overwhelmed with the amount of content in this course.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Anonymous 04/17/2023	Her canvas is organized horribly, it's impossible to tell which assignments are due when. She covers way more information in lectures than is normal and expects it to all be memorized by the exam. And when I say cover, I mean cover because she does not teach, she reads off the slides. Take another professor if you can. I regret taking this class so much.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Anonymous 03/06/2023	What a horrible, horrible, professor. Not only that, a very bad TA leader. She belittes her TA with almost every single thing they say. If we all came together and revealed the types of emails she sends to her TAs everyone would be shocked. Not only that, she can't teach. Don't take her. St Leger or Straney are great professors.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI150 Expecting a B Anonymous 12/25/2022	makes things confusing, i personally don't like her lecture style and her exams are unfair.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI150 Expecting an A Anonymous 12/18/2022	First of all, she just doesn't explain things well. Her slides are so confusing and she just can't explain the concepts well without stuttering and rephrasing the same sentences that isn't even answering the question. Second of all, she is kinda rude to student. She expects you to know things so if you ask her question, she gave you the "how can you not know this" look. Overall 150 class is fine but she made it really hard. She said she would never trick students but LOTS OF THE LECTURE QUIZ QUESTIONS PLUS FINALS QUESTIONS ARE TRICK QUESTIONS.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A+ Anonymous 12/16/2022	Dr. Paczolt does get kind of a bad rep, but I think that's just because when comparing her to the other genetics professors she is just known to be harder. Her class isn't curved, but she did offer a lot of opportunities for extra credit throughout the semester and even on the final exam. We had three exams and each also had about 4 extra credit points possible which was nice. The exam averages tended to be in the high 60s (MC and short answer) and the final average was in the mid-70s (all MC). You do have to put in a decent amount of studying time to be able to learn, understand, and memorize all of the material that will be on the test, so I'd recommend starting about a week in advance. For the short answer questions on the exams, you basically either know it or you don't which can get difficult. The wording on some of her multiple-choice questions can get confusing, so I definitely recommend taking the practice exams she posts to try to get used to it. The weekly 2-hour discussions are mandatory, but for the two weeks of discussion that lead up to each exam, you have dedicated exam review time where the TA goes over the important topics that will be covered on the exam in a PowerPoint. In the other weeks of discussion, you do something called GeneLab where you research a gene related to some kind of condition, which is a little tedious because it takes some time, but it's not that hard and it has a lot of easy points. Because discussions are two hours, it can feel extremely long sometimes which sucks, but it's not the worst thing ever. Her lectures can get a little bit boring because it's mainly her talking about the lecture slides, but she does post recordings on ELMS if you miss one or miss something important she says. One thing that would get a little frustrating is that sometimes she'll say important things but not have them on the slides, so it would feel like I'm trying to transcribe everything she's saying. Because of this, I recommend studying from the topic outlines she posts on ELMS rather than using the lecture slides because the outlines have things more written out than her slides do. She has topic quizzes on ELMS due about every week about each topic you learn in lecture, and they can get a little difficult sometimes but she gives a lot of time to take them. Her other grades include practice exams graded for completion (which are easy points if you do them and submit them on time), study plans (also easy points), tutorial quizzes about topics, and two homework assignments for each exam (which you go over in discussion). With all that being said, you do have to put a decent amount of time and effort into this class, but I definitely feel like I learned a lot that can be carried into my future classes.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI150 Expecting an A- Anonymous 12/12/2022	I personally did not like Dr. Paczolt as a professor. BSCI150 is a class for non-STEM majors, and I felt like she made it more like a class for STEM majors. Some of the lecture quizzes were so hard, even though I took thorough notes in the lecture. The lab this semester was lowkey a mess, as there are NEW PROFESSORS! I seriously think the grade average in this class will drop after the Fall 2022 semester. She made the assignments a lot harder than they had to be. I studied for so long on the material and still found it confusing. She also isn't always helpful when asking her about things you do not understand Personally, if you need a science with a lab and you are not a STEM-major I would take BSCI103. I think it would have been so much easier than this class was. For a gen-ed for most of us, if not all, Paczolt made it so much harder than it should have been! Also, an 8 page paper is given around the middle/end of the semester, which was a lot of work when every other class has a lot too.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI150 Expecting an A Anonymous 12/09/2022	In my opinion, this professor wasn't that great at explaining overall concepts. There are 3 teachers who are supposed to be teaching the BSCI 150 class but it looks like a lot of the work falls on her most times. Some of the questions on the exam can be pretty murky in their answer and kind of confusing to understand. If you study for them passively you can get at least an 70-80 on them. The exams were a mixture of multiple choice and short answer. The exams also come with extra credit at the end. There is a lab in this class, which is possibly the worst part of this class. A lot of the work is tedious and can be extremely confusing if you have never really worked in a lab before. Conclusion; Some of the content in this class was interesting but some topics were either not explained well or were just boring. If you like biology go ahead and take this class if you don't I would suggest you look elsewhere.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI150 Expecting an A Anonymous 12/07/2022	There were a few long papers but they were fairly manageable and we had more than enough time to get them done. If you have taken any other bio courses, a lot of the content in this course will be a simplified review. A lot of extra credit is also offered on the exams which was really nice. I personally really loved Dr. Paczolt as a professor. It was obvious that she is passionate about what she was lecturing on and the lecture content was engaging and fun. She is also very receptive to questions and will offer further resources if you are interested in the content and want to go more in depth.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Anonymous 11/30/2022	Passionate, helpful, and kind are not words I would use to describe Dr. Paczolt. Dr. Paczolt believes in assigning a lot of work for very little credit, that takes up hours of your time. The TA teaches this entire class, and the discussion is a waste of time and is extra BS work that has no correlation to the material taught in class. Every exam we had was on the same day as the chemistry department. When you go to office hours and ask questions you feel like a moron. The exams. 6-7 pages with 4-5 questions on each page and must be completed in 50 mins. There is not a lot of partial credit given. If you could not get the other professor, I would honestly wait till the next semester.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A Anonymous 06/03/2022	The teacher is good but the class is hard. I am giving her 4 stars because the final was surprisingly hard when she knew a lot of people had already struggled on the other exams. That being said, she did pretty explicitly outline the format and content of the final beforehand. I will say I think this teacher prepared me very well for biology classes after this that require genetics knowledge like general virology.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Anonymous 05/17/2022	Exams are extremely specific and often have details that were quickly mentioned in lecture; no curve with low exam averages; lectures are hard to focus in, and she just reads from the slides
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting a B- Anonymous 05/16/2022	Lecture: She's very nice, but the Exam wording is VERY specific. She doesn't curve the test at all. She does post old exams for practice, USE THEM so you can get used to her wording and types of questions. Also, do not use the PowerPoints to study, but instead, use the outlines she posts because they are much clearer. She goes crazy fast in class, but she posts the lectures. Discussion: Not hard, but tedious and painfully long (esp review days). Attendance is mandatory and most TAs do check.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Anonymous 05/03/2022	This is a horrible professor. Although she gives you a lot of material needed to do well, the questions on the exams are not related to what she tells you study. So you need to review everything for the exams. She gives no curve despite her exam averages being in the low 60's. 34 people dropped the class after the second exam if that helps put it into perspective
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting a C- Anonymous 12/18/2021	Exams are worded too specific, averages for exams were never good, no curve, good luck
Kimberly Paczolt Anonymous 12/17/2021	this class dropped my gpa so good luck
Kimberly Paczolt Anonymous 12/02/2021	a lot of information to memorize because she expects you to know everything she says on the exam. if you don't mention keywords you will get the entire question wrong. good luck
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Anonymous 11/18/2021	Horrible lecture, she's all over the place, exams are extremely difficult and there is no curve, maybe 5 points extra credit but not sure how that helps when the average is a 60. Wish someone would have told me this before taking her.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A- Anonymous 12/13/2020	Paczolt gives you all the materials you need to succeed (this is for online). She gives you a clear schedule and what you need to do. She also gives you previous exams which are crucial(!!!) because they are very similar to the new ones, however, she barely mentions she has that resource out and I felt like it was underutilized. I really appreciated this; however, her exams are very weird..her multiple choice gives more time than necessary but some questions ask obscure concepts she barely mentions in lecture but doesn't have on slides. Additionally, her topic videos are just so very long and IMO boring but that's just personal and not why I gave her 3 stars. I think compared to the other BSCI222 teachers, Dr. P would probably be my least recommended out of them. She makes work and assignments from anything (so many assignments), and I think I spent the most effort in this class than any other class I have taken (including chem231/241). She also has a predetermined grade cutoffs and DOESN'T CURVE, and doesn't round either (90% is an A-, 89.999999 is a B+). This causes her to have a lower grade distribution than other professors, so I also wouldn't recommend her for this reason.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Anonymous 12/18/2019	Paczolt is really nice and does just about everything she can to help you out. She posts her lecture slides, lecture summaries, lecture videos, pages to read in the book and problem sets, review videos made by her TAs, and old exams and their answer keys, so you can decide how you want to study. Office hours are also really great for getting your questions answered, and her TAs are absolutely amazing. Her exams are tough but fair - Paczolt likes to focus on the concepts instead of specific details, so you won't really have to memorize too much. But her short answer questions will really test if you know the material well enough to apply it to a setting you may not be familiar with. The gene lab assignments in discussion are easy points, Canvas quizzes are rather straightforward, there is quite a bit of extra credit, and her final exam reuses questions from the midterms that are rewritten differently so it's easier to study for. That said, there is no curve. In short, she gives you everything you need for an A, so if you put your time into this class you'll get it.
Kimberly Paczolt BSCI222 Expecting an A- Anonymous 11/26/2019	I think Dr P. deserves 5 stars but i'm gonna give her a 4 because she doesn't curve. Her lectures are fairly easy to understand and having the panapto videos as backup is really a life saver. I'll advice everyone to watch her panaptos thoroughly- her questions are only ever from what she talks about in class which is great. The exam review that the TA's make is also really helpful. I'll advice everyone to start studying a week before the exam. Go through the panaptos and take notes then go over the notes. Her exams can be kinda tricky, especially the multiple choice section, where she asks really detailed questions- You know those times where you read and you skim a section where you're like this probably won't come up on the exam. Yeah, it will come up.